ESSAY
The Danger of Pathway Blindness
By Coach Umar Ibrahim Bala
At the core of effective coaching is alignment — aligning skills, abilities, mindset, and understanding with a defined pathway. A coach who trains without understanding the pathway is merely keeping people busy. A coach who understands pathways is building futures.
As long as you are being coached, led, or trained by someone who is not familiar with pathways, you are being set up to fail — regardless of how passionate, loud, or well-intentioned that person may be.
This is not a criticism of effort. Some of the hardest-working people I have met in more than three decades in sport are pathway-blind. They arrive early. They stay late. They care deeply about the young people in front of them. And they are still, without knowing it, walking those young people towards a wall.
That is what makes pathway blindness so dangerous. It does not look like failure. It looks like commitment.
What Pathway Blindness Actually Looks Like
Pathway blindness is not ignorance of the sport. A pathway-blind coach may have excellent technical knowledge. They may run outstanding sessions. What they lack is any working model of where the athlete in front of them is going, and what has to be true at each stage for them to get there.
You can recognise it by what is missing:
- Training is designed around the next fixture, never the next stage.
- Nobody can say what happens to a player who does not turn professional — because nobody has thought about it.
- Selection decisions are made on who performs today, not on who is developing towards something.
- There is no record of where former players are now. Not because the information is private, but because nobody thought to keep it.
- When a player leaves, the relationship ends. There is no next step to hand them to.
Ask any coach in an unstructured system a simple question: where does a fourteen-year-old in your program realistically end up at twenty-four, and what are the three most likely versions of that? If the honest answer is a shrug or a hope, the pathway does not exist. The training does. The pathway does not.
Without Pathways
- There is no direction
- Without direction, there is no plan
- Without a plan, there is no future
This is how dead ends are created — when people are pushed forward without knowing where forward leads.
And the dead end is rarely dramatic. It is quiet. A player who was the best in his state at seventeen is, at twenty-three, working a job unconnected to sport, with no qualification, no network, and no idea that his athletic career was over two years before he stopped attending training. Nobody told him, because nobody was tracking a pathway. They were only tracking performance.
In Africa, this failure is systemic. We train without ecosystems. We coach without career ladders. We develop talent without exits, transitions, or post-development opportunities. As a result, frustration replaces fulfilment, and potential turns into regret.
Africa’s Leadership Crisis Is a Pathway Crisis
Africa does not lack talent. Africa does not lack passion. Africa does not lack effort.
What Africa lacks — across sport, governance, education, and institutions — is pathway literacy.
Pathway literacy is the ability to see a system as a sequence of connected stages rather than a series of isolated moments, and to design for the whole sequence. It is the difference between running a good session and building a career. Between hosting a tournament and creating a competition structure. Between finding a talented child and knowing what that child needs at fourteen, at eighteen, at twenty-two, and at thirty when the playing is over.
We celebrate beginnings but abandon continuity. We create programs without futures. We motivate people without destinations.
Why This Is a Leadership Failure, Not a Coaching One
It would be easy to place this at the feet of individual coaches. That would be a mistake.
A coach can only guide an athlete along a pathway that exists. If the federation has not defined what progression looks like, if there is no relationship between the school system and the club system, if there is no route from the club to the league and no route from the league to anything at all — then the coach is being asked to navigate a map that was never drawn.
Pathway blindness at the level of an individual coach costs one group of players. Pathway blindness at the level of an institution costs a generation.
This is why leadership in Africa must evolve from positions of authority to roles of responsibility — responsibility for designing, protecting, and sustaining pathways for those we lead. A leadership position in sport is not a reward for past service. It is a duty of care to everyone whose future runs through the system you govern.
What Pathway Literacy Requires
Becoming pathway-literate is not abstract. It asks a small number of concrete questions, and it asks them of every program, club, and federation:
- What are the defined stages an entrant moves through, and what marks the transition between them?
- Who is responsible for the athlete at each stage, and who hands them on?
- What are the realistic exits — not just the elite one — and are they prepared for?
- What happens to the ninety percent who will not turn professional?
- Where does the athlete go when the playing stops, and did anyone build that road?
A system that cannot answer these questions is not developing anybody. It is occupying them.
The Work Ahead
Pathway blindness is fixable. It is not a resource problem — mapping a pathway costs nothing but honesty and attention. It is a literacy problem, and literacy can be taught.
That is the work I have given the last stretch of my career to: making pathways visible, teachable, and designed rather than assumed. Because the alternative is what we have now — a continent full of gifted people being kept busy by people who care about them, walking together towards a wall neither of them can see.
Coach Umar Ibrahim Bala
Sports Systems Architect
THE FRAMEWORK BEHIND THIS
Pathway literacy has a method
Career Pathway Management (CPM) is the framework I developed to address exactly this gap — a structured, lifecycle-oriented approach that maps an athlete’s journey across five stages, from entry through development, elite career, transition, and post-career reintegration.